Do you
prefer ray guns to Rachel Ray?
When I
say wormhole, do your thoughts have nothing to do with burrowing insect larva?
Do you
know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that telepathy, telekinesis, and
teleportation are NOT the names of the three straight Teletubbies?
If you
answered yes to all three questions, then you may be a sci-fi fanatic. And if
you are a sci-fi fanatic, I suggest that you get your mutant android self to a
local library or newsstand to pick up a Popular Science magazine.
I checked
out one of these bad boys last week, and it was chock-full of plot potential.
However, some of the plots I found would probably NOT make for pleasant bedtime
reading… Don’t say you haven’t been
warned.
One
article featured NYU bioethics professor S. Matthew Liao who suggested that we
reengineer humans so they’re less of a burden for old Mama Earth.
He proposed that doctors use in-vitro fertilization to select only embryos with genes for short stature — because tiny folks leave tinier carbon footprints.
Gee, I guess Randy Newman was dead wrong back in 1977 — Short People DO have a reason to live, after all (thanks global warming!).
He proposed that doctors use in-vitro fertilization to select only embryos with genes for short stature — because tiny folks leave tinier carbon footprints.
Gee, I guess Randy Newman was dead wrong back in 1977 — Short People DO have a reason to live, after all (thanks global warming!).
Dr. Liao
also recommended the development of special drugs to induce meat allergies.
That way, the inconvenience of
anaphylaxis would reduce all that little people lust for big, bad carbon-intensive
beef.
These
approaches, reported Dr Liao (with a maniacal grin, I’m sure), would “encourage people to make the
eco-friendly choices that they seem to have trouble making on their own.”
Yeah.
That’s really
encouraging —
in the
sci-fi department.
Well, sleep
tight!
PROMPT: Give your imagination a good stretch — pick up a Popular Science magazine and fictionalize one of their features...
What could possibly go wrong?
What could possibly go wrong?
"short stature — because tiny folks leave tinier carbon footprints."
ReplyDelete...I like it already!!!